Can you please elaborate? I have laid out arguments for both sides and encouraged readers to come up with their own conclusion. To be clear, I do not support fearmongering, especially from non-subscribers. Thank you.
Is it really that difficult to understand? For 4 years, people keep writing and talking about a fictitious "virus", but nobody seems to be able to admit that it never existed!!! In return, one should write about the countless harms of these toxic-chemical and poisonous substances that have been forced on people to kill and harm millions/billions and in the long term - and all this on the basis of impertinent, dehumanizing and highly criminal lies, manipulation and fraud!!!! Any so-called "experiments" to publicize fictitious "viruses" or anything else has always been and still is an immense and massive fraud - and I am writing this because I had to deal with these experiments in the laboratory for almost 40 years - there are countless factors why people can get sick, but for sure these are NOT "viruses" or any other pathogenic agents that are exclusively "in vitro" = in glass, in petri dishes, corrugated plates etc., in chemically prepared cell lines (products in this regard have been available to buy for decades with the exact instructions) and exist "in silico" on a computer/tool - THAT has absolutely nothing to do with reality!!! In addition, a myriad of chemical substances are added to these experiments in culture/cell lines, which kill all material that comes into contact with them by interrupting the metabolism - and then so-called designed, synthetic-chemically produced "oligonucleotide primers"/letter groups (absolute nonsense) are used to focus on non-existent "viruses" etc. and there are no limits to the imagination here, because these "letter groups" can be varied millions of times, always what is "needed" at the time!!!
There is also NO specific so-called immunity (these are also synthetically produced finished products that are supposed to prove something that does not exist in reality!), because the human organism detoxifies every day and has to carry out a self-healing process, because we humans are exposed to countless "attacks" of all kinds of nanoparticles every day! And every year the organism experiences intracellular radical oxidative stress due to the change from warm to cold and vice versa, which impedes detoxification in some people (detoxification organs are the lungs, heart, kidneys, liver, mucous membranes and the largest human organ, the skin) - this results in so-called "cold symptoms" such as coughs, fever, tiredness, but also pneumonia, etc. These are all processes to keep the body healthy. - These are all processes to keep the body healthy - in addition, the annual so-called "flu vaccinations", which in turn contain harmful substances including nanoparticles, make detoxification even more difficult (these toxic substances and nanoparticles, mostly of a metallic nature, can attach themselves to the organs and inflame them and after years people wonder why they get cancer) because the organism is overwhelmed!!!
Especially in people who are age-related or already impaired by chronic illnesses and whose cell division and excretion of dead cell debris no longer works so well, this will lead to problems!!! etc. etc.
I won't bother to list the various articles here, if anybody want to know something, take a look at me!
This is not an attack on your person, these are simply facts that are difficult for doctors to accept, as you are already dictated this wrong concept during your studies - I wish you all the best and stick to the truth if this is somehow possible for you - you can always learn and rethink - nothing should be regarded as deadlocked "science" if there is nothing but hypotheses, assumptions and theories - it urgently needs proof/control experiments so that more people are not injured, harmed and killed!!!
With due respect, I thought your response was about my post, but it doesn't seem to be the case. I have been critiquing the Song et al. experiments, finding numerous gaps and inconsistencies. Much of the post is about a possible bait and switch. I should say, bait and switch number 1. Number 2 seems more obvious in their new preprint version.
Great read. Sounds plausible indeed.
And that last paragraph is spot on.
😂😂😂What absolute nonsense!!!!
Can you please elaborate? I have laid out arguments for both sides and encouraged readers to come up with their own conclusion. To be clear, I do not support fearmongering, especially from non-subscribers. Thank you.
Is it really that difficult to understand? For 4 years, people keep writing and talking about a fictitious "virus", but nobody seems to be able to admit that it never existed!!! In return, one should write about the countless harms of these toxic-chemical and poisonous substances that have been forced on people to kill and harm millions/billions and in the long term - and all this on the basis of impertinent, dehumanizing and highly criminal lies, manipulation and fraud!!!! Any so-called "experiments" to publicize fictitious "viruses" or anything else has always been and still is an immense and massive fraud - and I am writing this because I had to deal with these experiments in the laboratory for almost 40 years - there are countless factors why people can get sick, but for sure these are NOT "viruses" or any other pathogenic agents that are exclusively "in vitro" = in glass, in petri dishes, corrugated plates etc., in chemically prepared cell lines (products in this regard have been available to buy for decades with the exact instructions) and exist "in silico" on a computer/tool - THAT has absolutely nothing to do with reality!!! In addition, a myriad of chemical substances are added to these experiments in culture/cell lines, which kill all material that comes into contact with them by interrupting the metabolism - and then so-called designed, synthetic-chemically produced "oligonucleotide primers"/letter groups (absolute nonsense) are used to focus on non-existent "viruses" etc. and there are no limits to the imagination here, because these "letter groups" can be varied millions of times, always what is "needed" at the time!!!
There is also NO specific so-called immunity (these are also synthetically produced finished products that are supposed to prove something that does not exist in reality!), because the human organism detoxifies every day and has to carry out a self-healing process, because we humans are exposed to countless "attacks" of all kinds of nanoparticles every day! And every year the organism experiences intracellular radical oxidative stress due to the change from warm to cold and vice versa, which impedes detoxification in some people (detoxification organs are the lungs, heart, kidneys, liver, mucous membranes and the largest human organ, the skin) - this results in so-called "cold symptoms" such as coughs, fever, tiredness, but also pneumonia, etc. These are all processes to keep the body healthy. - These are all processes to keep the body healthy - in addition, the annual so-called "flu vaccinations", which in turn contain harmful substances including nanoparticles, make detoxification even more difficult (these toxic substances and nanoparticles, mostly of a metallic nature, can attach themselves to the organs and inflame them and after years people wonder why they get cancer) because the organism is overwhelmed!!!
Especially in people who are age-related or already impaired by chronic illnesses and whose cell division and excretion of dead cell debris no longer works so well, this will lead to problems!!! etc. etc.
I won't bother to list the various articles here, if anybody want to know something, take a look at me!
This is not an attack on your person, these are simply facts that are difficult for doctors to accept, as you are already dictated this wrong concept during your studies - I wish you all the best and stick to the truth if this is somehow possible for you - you can always learn and rethink - nothing should be regarded as deadlocked "science" if there is nothing but hypotheses, assumptions and theories - it urgently needs proof/control experiments so that more people are not injured, harmed and killed!!!
With due respect, I thought your response was about my post, but it doesn't seem to be the case. I have been critiquing the Song et al. experiments, finding numerous gaps and inconsistencies. Much of the post is about a possible bait and switch. I should say, bait and switch number 1. Number 2 seems more obvious in their new preprint version.