Real Prevention and Real Treatment and, Hopefully, Real Safe and Effective Vaccines
People do have both an Inner Knowing and the see with their own eyes knowledge and understanding of the great evil perpetrated against The People on Our Planet Earth. The People of America have shown they can still - and will - fight the good fight.
Moving from the premeditated Depraved-heart Mass Murder of Millions perpetrated with the planned denial of access to known Real Prevention for covid infection and the planned premeditated suppression and sabotage of effective Real Treatments, as these became known, and Real Doctors providing these treatments for all stages of covid infection - "their" FEAR FEAR FEAR inducing strategy to force the mRNA injection and force the approval of the genetic manipulation mRNA platform. Which "they" planned from the ~2013 time frame, when all attempts to make a safe and effective sars-cov (1) vaccine using the conventional vaccine platforms had failed and "their" mRNA had been advanced to the point of the possibility of GO.
Extracellular Vesicles were shown by Nobel Prize winner Victor Ambros to deliver toxic miR-155, which is generated in response to Endotoxin in jabs, to various organs and cell types.
Thank you. I think most of us (esp., the established community), under-estimate what nasty stuff EVs can carry, and which organs and tissues could be reached.
Maria Gutschi introduced me to Patrick Provost who is an expert in miR-155 that causes Endotoxin Induced Myocarditis, Liver Failure and other diseases.
"Your poisoned Macrophages attack and destroy your other cells." So, you have a nasty cumulative effect - from the contaminants and endotoxins, the dsRNAs, and the other immune-engendering products (incl. the intended ones). (BTW, a substantial proportion of my book discusses the dsRNAs, especially related to their potential to impair genetic integrity.) The involvement of the EVs can make all this even further escalate, or make some of this possible, as they shuttle bioactive/toxic stuff where the LNP carriers (or naked mRNAs) cannot go.
Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid is commonly used to mimic viral double stranded RNA, however it was found in 2019 that prior studies were affected by large Endotoxin contamination
The CryoEM structure of P2 S depicted in Figure 2-22 is described as having the desired properties
of the prefusion conformation similar to previously reported structures of P2 S. However, p. 8
admits that this concerns “the purified S2 protein expressed from DNA.”
I have been stuck on that for 4 years. If expressed from the DNA, then the modified mRNA with N-1-pseudouridine was not used. Therefore Pfizer has not shown if the modRNA in the LNPs used in the vaccine produces P2 S.
And thank you for the detailed review of EVs.
That makes me think the insane push to vaccinate >85% of the population ensured that us "antivaxxers" were inoculated regardless.
Thank you. "Therefore Pfizer has not shown if the modRNA in the LNPs used in the vaccine produces P2 S." Exactly. Thank you for highlighting this. This is one of my main concerns. It's all based on SOMETHING ELSE rather than the actual vaccine. They used whatever gave them the desired results. But this had nothing to do with the real vaccines. This is a most critical bait and switch, imo. For the actual vaccines, we do not know their cellular expression profile and all the rest. They were masquerading the most important step and celebrating the results of something irrelevant. The entire immunity model hinges on the first step which is fabricated. No idea to what extent they actually investigated HOW immunity is activated. Further, did they ever consider EVs as the drivers of (non-traditional) immune responses? To the best of my knowledge, this was totally ignored.
These gentechnological injections that many call vaccinations or vaccines simply inhibit the RT that proceeds the actual PCR-test. If the RT is inhibited or even blocked, the actual PCR-test will remain negative. That is what has been demonstrated in the RCTs (the chance of getting negative tests increased in the active groups) about 10-12 days after the first injection of the modRNA.. Look at Polack's article in NEJM, December 2020.
In order to inhibit the RT you may need only certain peptides. I bet that "they" investigated thoroughly the best peptide for this purpose. About 10-12 days after first injection the modRNA will have produced enough of these presumably small peptides inhibiting the PCR test.
Apart from these specific and small peptides, the modRNA will produced many nonsense peptides and proteines causing different toxic effects..
Yes, you are correct: I have not read your article. However, I read your conclusions here. Maybe, your hypothesis on extracellular vesicles (EVs) may explain some toxicity, but it may not explain the following facts:
1. The effect on the RT-PCR-Test was present from Day 11 after first jab onwards.
2, Oon Day 21 not any response on antibodies (AB) was detected. Hence a strong dissociation of the effects.
3. "Their" whole story was odd from the beginning as IgG antibodies will not occur on mucous membranes.
4. No pharma industry would have ever jumped into such a large Phase-3-program without being nearly sure that they could "win". Particularly not with the concerns given in No. 3. They must have known about the dirty trick behind the scene.
5. That dirty trick was investigated or confirmed by Ralph Baric end of December 2019 in his "challenge study". Counted-signed by Barney Graham.
6. FDA and Pfizer had to admitt that they - officially - would not (completely) understand the mechanism of action. I am sure that they understand it (see above, inhibitory peptides) but cannot tell.
7. Moderna investigated the predicticity of AB levels for break-through invections among the ~5k active participants. They had to confess that ABs cannot predict break-through infections in the vaccinated people. And they very thoroughly investigated this issue to prevent uncovering the scam.
8. Moderna required RT-PCR testing without cause from ALL participants prior to the "participant decision visit" (PDV), i.e. the visit prior to unblinding and subsequent vaccination of the placebo group. Even here the active group performed significantly
"better", although there was no "disease".
There many other hints that the "effect" of the modRNA (and off course: the vector-DNA-"vaccines") on the outcome of the RT-PCR-Test was the actual fraud!
I am very sorry indeed. This has nothing to do with my article. Regarding
"extracellular vesicles (EVs) may explain some toxicity." This is not what my preprint is all about. Kindly, do not critique articles that you have not read. Frankly, I do not even know if you are a real person. "You" have posted these exact same messages FREQUENTLY in response to several of my posts. Both, your first one, and this extended one, are per verbatim the exact same ones as before. It does not matter what my posts have been all about, you have commented with these same "objections" and also cross-posted on your own platform. Here is my hypothesis. (a) You are not a real person but an automated computer program. (b) if you are a real person, why are you just copy-and-pasting the exact same again and again, without ever reading the articles?
Miracles do happen.
Real Prevention and Real Treatment and, Hopefully, Real Safe and Effective Vaccines
People do have both an Inner Knowing and the see with their own eyes knowledge and understanding of the great evil perpetrated against The People on Our Planet Earth. The People of America have shown they can still - and will - fight the good fight.
Moving from the premeditated Depraved-heart Mass Murder of Millions perpetrated with the planned denial of access to known Real Prevention for covid infection and the planned premeditated suppression and sabotage of effective Real Treatments, as these became known, and Real Doctors providing these treatments for all stages of covid infection - "their" FEAR FEAR FEAR inducing strategy to force the mRNA injection and force the approval of the genetic manipulation mRNA platform. Which "they" planned from the ~2013 time frame, when all attempts to make a safe and effective sars-cov (1) vaccine using the conventional vaccine platforms had failed and "their" mRNA had been advanced to the point of the possibility of GO.
Now to RFK Jr. and MAHA Hope.
Miracles do happen.
Extracellular Vesicles were shown by Nobel Prize winner Victor Ambros to deliver toxic miR-155, which is generated in response to Endotoxin in jabs, to various organs and cell types.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/nobel-prize-shared-award-2024-to
Thank you. I think most of us (esp., the established community), under-estimate what nasty stuff EVs can carry, and which organs and tissues could be reached.
Maria Gutschi introduced me to Patrick Provost who is an expert in miR-155 that causes Endotoxin Induced Myocarditis, Liver Failure and other diseases.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/53-years-since-endotoxin-and-lipid
"Your poisoned Macrophages attack and destroy your other cells." So, you have a nasty cumulative effect - from the contaminants and endotoxins, the dsRNAs, and the other immune-engendering products (incl. the intended ones). (BTW, a substantial proportion of my book discusses the dsRNAs, especially related to their potential to impair genetic integrity.) The involvement of the EVs can make all this even further escalate, or make some of this possible, as they shuttle bioactive/toxic stuff where the LNP carriers (or naked mRNAs) cannot go.
Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid is commonly used to mimic viral double stranded RNA, however it was found in 2019 that prior studies were affected by large Endotoxin contamination
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/polyic-viral-dsrna-mimic-studies
The CryoEM structure of P2 S depicted in Figure 2-22 is described as having the desired properties
of the prefusion conformation similar to previously reported structures of P2 S. However, p. 8
admits that this concerns “the purified S2 protein expressed from DNA.”
I have been stuck on that for 4 years. If expressed from the DNA, then the modified mRNA with N-1-pseudouridine was not used. Therefore Pfizer has not shown if the modRNA in the LNPs used in the vaccine produces P2 S.
And thank you for the detailed review of EVs.
That makes me think the insane push to vaccinate >85% of the population ensured that us "antivaxxers" were inoculated regardless.
Thank you. "Therefore Pfizer has not shown if the modRNA in the LNPs used in the vaccine produces P2 S." Exactly. Thank you for highlighting this. This is one of my main concerns. It's all based on SOMETHING ELSE rather than the actual vaccine. They used whatever gave them the desired results. But this had nothing to do with the real vaccines. This is a most critical bait and switch, imo. For the actual vaccines, we do not know their cellular expression profile and all the rest. They were masquerading the most important step and celebrating the results of something irrelevant. The entire immunity model hinges on the first step which is fabricated. No idea to what extent they actually investigated HOW immunity is activated. Further, did they ever consider EVs as the drivers of (non-traditional) immune responses? To the best of my knowledge, this was totally ignored.
Thank you!
And sorry for diagreeing with your hypothesis.
I am convinved that the things are much simpler:
These gentechnological injections that many call vaccinations or vaccines simply inhibit the RT that proceeds the actual PCR-test. If the RT is inhibited or even blocked, the actual PCR-test will remain negative. That is what has been demonstrated in the RCTs (the chance of getting negative tests increased in the active groups) about 10-12 days after the first injection of the modRNA.. Look at Polack's article in NEJM, December 2020.
In order to inhibit the RT you may need only certain peptides. I bet that "they" investigated thoroughly the best peptide for this purpose. About 10-12 days after first injection the modRNA will have produced enough of these presumably small peptides inhibiting the PCR test.
Apart from these specific and small peptides, the modRNA will produced many nonsense peptides and proteines causing different toxic effects..
Not read the article?
Yes, you are correct: I have not read your article. However, I read your conclusions here. Maybe, your hypothesis on extracellular vesicles (EVs) may explain some toxicity, but it may not explain the following facts:
1. The effect on the RT-PCR-Test was present from Day 11 after first jab onwards.
2, Oon Day 21 not any response on antibodies (AB) was detected. Hence a strong dissociation of the effects.
3. "Their" whole story was odd from the beginning as IgG antibodies will not occur on mucous membranes.
4. No pharma industry would have ever jumped into such a large Phase-3-program without being nearly sure that they could "win". Particularly not with the concerns given in No. 3. They must have known about the dirty trick behind the scene.
5. That dirty trick was investigated or confirmed by Ralph Baric end of December 2019 in his "challenge study". Counted-signed by Barney Graham.
6. FDA and Pfizer had to admitt that they - officially - would not (completely) understand the mechanism of action. I am sure that they understand it (see above, inhibitory peptides) but cannot tell.
7. Moderna investigated the predicticity of AB levels for break-through invections among the ~5k active participants. They had to confess that ABs cannot predict break-through infections in the vaccinated people. And they very thoroughly investigated this issue to prevent uncovering the scam.
8. Moderna required RT-PCR testing without cause from ALL participants prior to the "participant decision visit" (PDV), i.e. the visit prior to unblinding and subsequent vaccination of the placebo group. Even here the active group performed significantly
"better", although there was no "disease".
There many other hints that the "effect" of the modRNA (and off course: the vector-DNA-"vaccines") on the outcome of the RT-PCR-Test was the actual fraud!
Maybe you should read my expert opionions:
Comirnaty English:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/GNV9M3
Comirnaty, German:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/My5eA4
or even better, because more recent, Spikevax,, however only in German:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/snSQiH
I am very sorry indeed. This has nothing to do with my article. Regarding
"extracellular vesicles (EVs) may explain some toxicity." This is not what my preprint is all about. Kindly, do not critique articles that you have not read. Frankly, I do not even know if you are a real person. "You" have posted these exact same messages FREQUENTLY in response to several of my posts. Both, your first one, and this extended one, are per verbatim the exact same ones as before. It does not matter what my posts have been all about, you have commented with these same "objections" and also cross-posted on your own platform. Here is my hypothesis. (a) You are not a real person but an automated computer program. (b) if you are a real person, why are you just copy-and-pasting the exact same again and again, without ever reading the articles?
It is funny to consider my as computer troll.
Particularly as we already communicated via e-mail.
Why should I spent hours reading your article, if the comclusions are sufficient to know that this is the wrong track.
I will leave your comments as they are. I am sure my readers will appreciate what is going on. I will not comment any further.