A very thorough review of the mechanisms of this "shedding." I like elimination via exosomes or something like that, because "shedding" with respect to vaccines, means live attenuated virus in vaccines. So people were labelled as crazy conspiracists.
Looking forward to Part 2. Anything on UV light degrading the spike or mRNA?
Thank you. What an interesting question. I have not come across it. Perhaps you can tell me more, please? I always love reading your articles and notes.
Thanks for this! I previously heard about UV light being used to combat pathogenic infections more generally. In this regard, if this really works, then one may ask why we only learn about it now. If it does not work, then it may indeed be because of its lab origin. It's interesting that they say they can better degrade the spike protein than the RNA.
If it could deactivate, or dissolve the vaccine-spike, it could be a huge component to help with the jab-induced injuries - provide they can target it sufficiently well without unintentionally affecting human proteins. The other question would be if it could help reduce "shedding." (And perhaps intense sunlight or sauna etc could prove to be useful as well).
Now, if it turns out that there is a huge difference between the viral spike and that from the vaccine, then perhaps this may help people see how deleterious the stabilization mechanisms such as via psi have been?
Thanks for this! I previously heard about UV light being used to combat pathogenic infections more generally. In this regard, if this really works, then one may ask why we only learn about it now. If it does not work, then it may indeed be because of its lab origin. It's interesting that they say they can better degrade the spike protein than the RNA.
If it could deactivate, or dissolve the vaccine-spike, it could be a huge component to help with the jab-induced injuries - provide they can target it sufficiently well without unintentionally affecting human proteins. The other question would be if it could help reduce "shedding." (And perhaps intense sunlight or sauna etc could prove to be useful as well).
Now, if it turns out that there is a huge difference between the viral spike and that from the vaccine, then perhaps this may help people see how deleterious the stabilization mechanisms such as via psi have been?
A very thorough review of the mechanisms of this "shedding." I like elimination via exosomes or something like that, because "shedding" with respect to vaccines, means live attenuated virus in vaccines. So people were labelled as crazy conspiracists.
Looking forward to Part 2. Anything on UV light degrading the spike or mRNA?
Thank you. What an interesting question. I have not come across it. Perhaps you can tell me more, please? I always love reading your articles and notes.
I remember something about this in the past, and went looking and found this. However, not sure if it applies to the vaccine made spike protein.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/01/240110120320.htm
Thanks for this! I previously heard about UV light being used to combat pathogenic infections more generally. In this regard, if this really works, then one may ask why we only learn about it now. If it does not work, then it may indeed be because of its lab origin. It's interesting that they say they can better degrade the spike protein than the RNA.
If it could deactivate, or dissolve the vaccine-spike, it could be a huge component to help with the jab-induced injuries - provide they can target it sufficiently well without unintentionally affecting human proteins. The other question would be if it could help reduce "shedding." (And perhaps intense sunlight or sauna etc could prove to be useful as well).
Now, if it turns out that there is a huge difference between the viral spike and that from the vaccine, then perhaps this may help people see how deleterious the stabilization mechanisms such as via psi have been?
Thanks for this! I previously heard about UV light being used to combat pathogenic infections more generally. In this regard, if this really works, then one may ask why we only learn about it now. If it does not work, then it may indeed be because of its lab origin. It's interesting that they say they can better degrade the spike protein than the RNA.
If it could deactivate, or dissolve the vaccine-spike, it could be a huge component to help with the jab-induced injuries - provide they can target it sufficiently well without unintentionally affecting human proteins. The other question would be if it could help reduce "shedding." (And perhaps intense sunlight or sauna etc could prove to be useful as well).
Now, if it turns out that there is a huge difference between the viral spike and that from the vaccine, then perhaps this may help people see how deleterious the stabilization mechanisms such as via psi have been?
Thank you!